The power consumption of "sample128_After section 6.2" in advertising state

Recently,I test the power consumption of "sample128_After section 6.2" when in advertising state,
I set :
APP_ADV_INT_MIN=APP_ADV_INT_MAX=3600
define CFG_DEEP_SLEEP
define DEVELOPMENT_DEBUG 1
and add the following code in function app_adv_func()：

/////////////////////////////////////////////
如果应用程序_ADV_INT_MAX >3200 )// > 2000 ms
app_set_deep_sleep();
else
app_set_extended_sleep();
/////////////////////////////////////////////

I found the power consumption is much bigger than Smarttag,In smarttag I make following settings:

define CFG_DEEP_SLEEP
define DEVELOPMENT_DEBUG 1

and don't let the da14580 stop advertising in function app_adv_timer_handler().

1. what cause the advertising power consumption of "sample128_After section 6.2" is much bigger than Smarttag?

2. The arch_main.c is different in these two reference designs ，is this the reason ?
I think this may cause the sleeping mechanism different in these two eference designs.

I just want to let the power consumption of "sample128_After section 6.2" in advertising state as low
as possible(the advertising interval is 3600).

would you please give me some help?