DA9062-00 vs DA9062-A0

⚠️
Hi there.. thanks for coming to the forums. Exciting news! we’re now in the process of moving to our new forum platform that will offer better functionality and is contained within the main Dialog website. All posts and accounts have been migrated. We’re now accepting traffic on the new forum only - please POST any new threads at//www.xmece.com/support. We’ll be fixing bugs / optimising the searching and tagging over the coming days.
4 posts / 0 new
Last post
Fri, 2019-02-01 15:49
#1
tentner
Offline
Last seen:2 months 6 days ago
加入:2018-12-07 09:36
DA9062-00 vs DA9062-A0

Hi,

in AN-PM-080 it says in the revision log "Replaced DA9062-00 with DA9062-A0". Is this -A0 the correct (new) part number? The quotation we got from our distributor reads -00. Can anybody bring some light into this?

Thanks,

Thomas

Device:
DA14580
Mon, 2019-02-04 09:59
ED_Dialog
Offline
Last seen:1 month 3 weeks ago
工作人员
加入:2017-09-18 11:54
Hello Thomas,

Hello Thomas,

The -00 and the -A0 parts are the same parts. We made the change from the -00 to the -A0 for traceability reasons. This is a relatively new change, so it might take some time for the new PN to filter through. However, as I have mentioned, the parts are the same, so there should be no issues with programming the parts.

Will these parts be used for In-circuit programmed or for prototypes?

Kind regards,
Elliott Dexter

Mon, 2019-02-04 10:03
tentner
Offline
Last seen:2 months 6 days ago
加入:2018-12-07 09:36
Hi Dexter,

Hi Dexter,

thanks. We plan to use ICP. Shall we use the -A0 name in our BOM?

Regards,

Thomas

Thu, 2019-02-07 13:39
ED_Dialog
Offline
Last seen:1 month 3 weeks ago
工作人员
加入:2017-09-18 11:54
Hello Thomas,

Hello Thomas,

My suggestion would be to use the -A0.

Kind regards,
Elliott Dexter

Accepted answer